The article was very descriptive in summarizing perfectly what the plot of Star Trek is about, without making it too complicated with the subplots and story arcs that it has or  focusing on big, shocking events like Spock's death. You told the character's personalities perfectly, with no spoilers but detailed simplicity. Also you mentioned every technical element of the show without dragging on like some fandoms do. You could work on describing how the show makes "all the technology seem real" and how the music I is catchy and creative. I know that the original Star Trek composed their own music, so you can include that. Also you could describe how the writers of the show make the story so intriguing and not make it another typical space show. What makes the show's writing unique from the other tv shows of the 60s? And what makes it unique from shows similar to it like Star Wars? 

Overall ll it was a well written article missing a few elements of telling but not saying how. I'm glad and surprised to see a show from about 4 decades ago be reviewed and published.