All Nonfiction
- Bullying
 - Books
 - Academic
 - Author Interviews
 - Celebrity interviews
 - College Articles
 - College Essays
 - Educator of the Year
 - Heroes
 - Interviews
 - Memoir
 - Personal Experience
 - Sports
 - Travel & Culture
 All Opinions
- Bullying
 - Current Events / Politics
 - Discrimination
 - Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
 - Entertainment / Celebrities
 - Environment
 - Love / Relationships
 - Movies / Music / TV
 - Pop Culture / Trends
 - School / College
 - Social Issues / Civics
 - Spirituality / Religion
 - Sports / Hobbies
 All Hot Topics
- Bullying
 - Community Service
 - Environment
 - Health
 - Letters to the Editor
 - Pride & Prejudice
 - What Matters
 - Back
 
Summer Guide
- Program Links
 - Program Reviews
 - Back
 
College Guide
- College Links
 - College Reviews
 - College Essays
 - College Articles
 - Back
 
Call of Duty: World at War
Call of Duty usually makes a very good game but I don’t understand why they did not let activision make the new game. Call of Duty: world at war is one of the worst games I have ever played if not the worst. There is one thing on this game that I actually like and it is no reason to buy it. 
 There are many things that make it a bad game but the worst is the regestering system is horrible and they really don’t seem to be fixing it at all. It is really easy to get a kill but the number of times you get killed is very high also. And if you ever play on Xbox live the spawns will drive you up a wall. The only reason I play this game is because they added a game called zombies. This is the lone decent part of the game.
 Call of Duty should just stick to letting activision make their game I bet they make a lot more money. It is never good when the older game is still better than the new one by a long shot. I would not recommend this game to anyone.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 1 comment.
17 articles 0 photos 3 comments
Favorite Quote:
"Let that child alone!"--Piccolo, Dragon Ball Z.